Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1440

reference
120-tree-1
name
1440
tree-preservation-order

undefined

120-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.030437 50.866440)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.030366 50.866433,-1.030369 50.866446,-1.030379 50.866459,-1.030395 50.866469,-1.030414 50.866476,-1.030436 50.866478,-1.030458 50.866476,-1.030478 50.866470,-1.030494 50.866460,-1.030504 50.866448,-1.030508 50.866434,-1.030505 50.866420,-1.030495 50.866407,-1.030480 50.866397,-1.030460 50.866391,-1.030438 50.866388,-1.030416 50.866390,-1.030396 50.866396,-1.030380 50.866406,-1.030370 50.866419,-1.030366 50.866433)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL